OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Issue 114: figure 2 out of date


I have to agree with Sanjay here. The new picture you sent is what is currently in the doc. While it doesn’t reflect close does figure 2 really need to reflect close anyway? This is kind of a brief intro to a common RM exchange, I don’t think the intention with this diagram is to cover every possible permutation. I would suggest the figure is fine as it is not incorrect and for the messages it does portray it is up to date with the spec.

 

If there were a proposal that clearly adds close to this diagram and updates the corresponding text I wouldn’t have an issue with adopting it. In the absence of such a proposal I’d be just as happy to close this with no action as I don’t see anything wrong with the current diagram or text.

 

Marc Goodner

Technical Diplomat

Microsoft Corporation

Tel: (425) 703-1903

Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/


From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 1:34 PM
To: Christopher B Ferris; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date

 

 

Chris,

 

Could you please point out the difference between your proposed figure and the existing one. Perhaps it's the blurriness of the picture that is making it difficult for me to see the difference.

 

Also, I am not sure how your proposed figure matches your issue justification (does not reflect Close() operation).

 

-- Sanjay

 


From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, Apr 07, 2006 11:42 AM
To: Patil, Sanjay; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date


I mean replace figure 2 with this one



Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295


"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>

04/07/2006 02:07 PM

To

Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM@IBMUS, "WS-RX TC" <WS-RX_TC@us.ibm.com>

cc

 

Subject

RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date

 

 

 




 
I thought that once a Sequence is closed and a final Ack is sent, the RMD does not accept any new messages (other than protocol messages) in that sequence.  Am I missing something?
 
-- Sanjay


From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com]
Sent:
Friday, Apr 07, 2006 5:22 AM
To:
WS-RX TC
Subject:
[ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date



Title: Figure 2 (cd3) [1] is out of date with the changes to the potocol


Description:


Figure 2 (cd3) [1] is out of date with the changes to the potocol


Justification:


does not reflect Close() operation


Target: core


Proposal:


replace Figure 2 graphic with this one




[1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200602/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-03.pdf


Cheers,


Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]