Call it porposed-01,
this is the only new issue I’ve seen filed in the last week.
From: Christopher B
Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:11 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] new issue: misuse
of "request" term
Description:
Line
215 of CD03 reads:
The
RM Source will expect to receive acknowledgements from the RM Destination
during the course of a
message
exchange at occasions described in Section 3 below. Should an acknowledgement
not be
received
in a timely fashion, the RM Source MUST re-transmit the request since either
the request or the
associated
acknowledgement may have been lost.
Target:
core
Type:
editorial
Proposal:
s/request/message/g
in the second sentence above so that it reads as follows:
The
RM Source will expect to receive acknowledgements from the RM Destination
during the course of a
message
exchange at occasions described in Section 3 below. Should an acknowledgement
not be
received
in a timely fashion, the RM Source MUST re-transmit the message since either
the message or the
associated
acknowledgement may have been lost.
Cheers,
Christopher
Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295