[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue: Change default value of fault uri
I agree that we should not be using the WS-A value (since the Rec says that
we should not)... but I don't understand why we refer to this as a
"default". Aren't we simply saying that all WS-ReliableMessaging faults
MUST use this IRI for their [action] property?
Peter Niblett
"Marc Goodner"
<mgoodner@microso
ft.com> To
<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
08/06/2006 01:32 cc
Subject
[ws-rx] NEW Issue: Change default
value of fault uri
Title: Change default value of fault uri
Description: The default value for the fault uri is set to the default
value of the WS-A faults. WS-A Rec says this value should only be used for
WS-A faults. We need to define our own default uri for faults.
Target: core
Type: design
Proposal:
In section 4 change:
Entities that generate WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the
[action] property the default fault
action IRI defined in WS-Addressing. The value from the W3C Recommendation
is below for informational purposes:
http://schemas.xmlsoap.orgwww.w3c.org/ws/20045/08/addressing/fault
To:
Entities that generate WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the
[action] property the default fault
action IRI defined below:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200604/fault
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]