ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [NEW ISSUE] Consistent use of wsrm: in normative text
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:12:55 -0400
Title: Consistent use of wsrm: in normative
text
Justification: we're inconsistent in
the spec(s) when it comes to referencing RM elements. Sometimes we
say "wsrm:SequenceAck" and sometimes we just say "SequenceAck".
We need to be consistent in whether or not we use "wsrm:"
- and also the font :-)
Proposal:
[flip of coin...] Change all
references to RM elements to just the element name w/o the "wsrm:"
and use the fixed (courier?) font.
e.g. "....the SequenceAcknowledgement
element...."
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]