ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:49:56 -0400
I like the idea of just getting rid
of the term "discard", so how about this (note I added "terminate"
to the text too):
/wsrm:CreateSequenceResponse/wsrm:IncompleteSequenceBehavior
This optional element, if present, specifies the behavior that the RM Destination
will exhibit
upon the
closure, or termination, of an incomplete
sequence.
A value of “DiscardEntireSequence” indicates that none of the messages
for the sequence will
be delivered by the RM Destination
if the sequence is closed, or terminated, when there are one
or more gaps in the
final SequenceAcknowledgement
A value of “DiscardFollowingFirstGap” indicates that messages in the
sequence beyond the first
gap will
not be delivered by the RM
Destination when there are one or more gaps in the
final SequenceAcknowledgement.
The default value of “NoDiscard” indicates that all acknowledged messages
in the sequence will be
delivered by the RM Destination.
thanks
-Doug
"Marc Goodner"
<mgoodner@microsoft.com>
06/09/2006 11:39 AM
|
To
| Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard" |
|
Doug,
This seems wordier than
necessary. The text added for DiscardEntireSequence does not use
the definition you added for discard at all. The other two values seem
like they would benefit from simply changing the word discard to not deliver.
I don’t think it is necessary
to prepend “note” to the sentence added below or “quote” any of the
words in this proposal.
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 12:03 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Define "discard"
Title: Define "discard"
Description/Justification:
In WD13.pdf section 3 - line 308++ - should we define "discard"
- its not
clear to me that we mean the discarded messages will NEVER (and have
never) be delivered to the AD, instead of just "from now on the RMD
won't deliver them".
Target: wsrm spec
Type: design
Proposal:
Modify the text for IncompleteSequenceBehavior to be (new stuff in bold):
(Chris/Bob is this new stuff consistent with what you guys wanted?)
/wsrm:CreateSequenceResponse/wsrm:IncompleteSequenceBehavior
This optional element, if present, specifies the behavior that the RM Destination
will exhibit upon the
closure of an incomplete sequence. For the purposes of defining
the values used, the term
'discard' refers to the RM Destination never delivering a particular message
to the AD.
A value of “DiscardEntireSequence” indicates that the entire sequence
will be discarded by the RM
Destination if the sequence is closed when there are one or more gaps in
the
SequenceAcknowledgement/Final. Note, this means that the RM Destination
will not deliver any
messages to the AD until the final SequenceAcknowledgement is determined
and there are no
gaps in it.
A value of “DiscardFollowingFirstGap” indicates that messages in the
sequence beyond the first gap will
be discarded by the RM Destination when there are one or more gaps in the
SequenceAcknowledgement/Final.
The default value of “NoDiscard” indicates that no acknowledged messages
in the sequence will be
discarded by the RM Destination.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]