[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Latest WDs
Doug +1 from me. Sounds like a useful plan. Paul Doug Davis wrote: > > These changes look right to me and will make them in the editor's play > area. > If anyone thinks otherwise please let me know. > > BTW - question for the TC... I wish there was some way to make the > very latest editor's draft available without pushing it (or even a > document update notice) to the TC's mailing list each time we make any > kind of change. Since I doubt we can get a fixed URL (like we wish we > had for the issue list) w/o bugging Robin each time I was wondering > what people thought of me creating two new docs: "Latest Editor WSRM > " and "Latest Editor WSRMP" in the main TC doc list and I'll try > to update those on a regular basis. I believe that between using a > fixed name and by asking that update noticed not be sent to the > mailing list it should not cause an increase in the amount of email > traffic but still give TC members access to the latest stuff. While > we still won't have a fixed URL - this is better than nothing. I > think that since we're winding down and people are going over the > specs with a fine-tooth-comb, it would make it best if people could > always have the latest stuff available for reference/examination. > Thoughts? > > thanks, > -Doug > > > > *Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com>* > > 06/14/2006 08:26 AM > > > To > ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > cc > > Subject > Re: [ws-rx] Latest WDs > > > > > > > > > > Hi Doug, > > Line numbers are off again.... hopefully you will find the bits I mean. > > The following comments apply to the wd-15-diff, and are all editorial > changes around the use of the RFC 2119 keywords. In each case, it is just > a tidyup to bring the description of one of the message elements into > line > with the new style. > > /wsrm:CreateSequenceResponse/wsrm:IncompleteSequenceBehavior > Strike the word "OPTIONAL" > > Section: /wsrm:SequenceFault/wsrm:Detail > The first sentence starts with the bad use of OPTIONAL... replace it with > "This element, if present, carries application specific...." > > Cheers > > Matt > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf paul@wso2.com "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]