Re: [ws-rx] Latest WDs

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Done - look in the "Editor's Drafts"
folder for the latest pdf files.
Only known outstanding issue: line numbers
are messed up.

thanks,
-Doug

Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>

06/14/2006 10:57 AM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [ws-rx] Latest WDs

Doug

+1 from me. Sounds like a useful plan.

Paul


Doug Davis wrote:
>
> These changes look right to me and will make them in the editor's
play 
> area.
> If anyone thinks otherwise please let me know.
>
> BTW - question for the TC... I wish there was some way to make the
> very latest editor's draft available without pushing it (or even a
> document update notice) to the TC's mailing list each time we make
any 
> kind of change.  Since I doubt we can get a fixed URL (like we
wish we 
> had for the issue list) w/o bugging Robin each time I was wondering
> what people thought of me creating two new docs:  "Latest
Editor WSRM 
> "  and  "Latest Editor WSRMP"   in the
main TC doc list and I'll try 
> to update those on a regular basis.  I believe that between using
a 
> fixed name and by asking that update noticed not be sent to the 
> mailing list it should not cause an increase in the amount of email
> traffic but still give TC members access to the latest stuff.  While
> we still won't have a fixed URL - this is better than nothing.  I
> think that since we're winding down and people are going over the
> specs with a fine-tooth-comb, it would make it best if people could
> always have the latest stuff available for reference/examination.
  
> Thoughts?
>
> thanks,
> -Doug
>
>
>
> *Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com>*
>
> 06/14/2006 08:26 AM
>
>                  
> To
>                  ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> cc
>                  
> Subject
>                  Re:
[ws-rx] Latest WDs
>
>
>
>                  
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Line numbers are off again.... hopefully you will find the bits I
mean.
>
> The following comments apply to the wd-15-diff, and are all editorial
> changes around the use of the RFC 2119 keywords. In each case, it
is just
> a tidyup to bring the description of one of the message elements into
> line
> with the new style.
>
> /wsrm:CreateSequenceResponse/wsrm:IncompleteSequenceBehavior
> Strike the word "OPTIONAL"
>
> Section: /wsrm:SequenceFault/wsrm:Detail
> The first sentence starts with the bad use of OPTIONAL... replace
it with
> "This element, if present, carries application specific...."
>
> Cheers
>
> Matt
>
>


-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com