[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue proposed-01 Inappropriate Fault destination
This is the only new issue I
have seen proposed in the last week. From: Durand, Jacques R.
[mailto:JDurand@us.fujitsu.com] Description - The paragraph beginning Section 4 (Faults)
suggests that faults that relate to the processing of RM headers (and that relate to known
sequences) SHOULD be sent to same destination as <wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement>
messages. But that does not make much sense for Faults of this
type that originate in the RMS - such as InvalidAcknowledgement, and that clearly result from
an unexpected behavior of the RMD. - The current text is not accurate in stating that
“All other faults in the section Relate to the processing of RM header blocks
targeted….” , as some faults may not need to originate in the processing of messages in order
to be generated , e.g. due to resource shortage (e.g.
SequenceTerminated). Justification Recommending that some RMS-originating faults such
as InvalidAcknowledgement, UnknownSequence etc. go to the same destination as
<wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement> messages is simply not appropriate, while it is the RMD that would benefit from taking
knowledge of these. In many cases, the destination of
<wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement> is the RMS itself. The destination of such faults should either be left
to an external agreement / policy, or recommended to be the RM Destination. Target: core Proposal: (a + b) (a)- Replace: "All other faults in this section
relate to the processing of RM header blocks targeted at known Sequences" with: "All other faults in this section relate
to known Sequences", which is more accurate (because some faults may be generated outside
message processing, such as SequenceTerminated.) (b)- Replace: "Entities that generate Sequence
faults SHOULD send those faults to the same [destination] as
<wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement> messages" with: "Entities that generate Sequence faults and
that are on the destination end of the sequence SHOULD send those faults to the
same [destination] as <wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement> messages." |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]