[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified,state of sequence is unclear
Just a bit more on this topic: How is this consistent with the text that says closure of a sequence is optional prior to termination as indicated in WD 15 Section 3.2 starting at line 426? "To ensure that the Sequence ends with a known final state either the RM Source or RM Destination MAY choose to close the Sequence before terminating it." Thanks -bob -----Original Message----- From: Bob Freund-Hitachi Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 2:05 PM To: Paul Fremantle; Doug Davis Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified, state of sequence is unclear I agree it seems to be so. But in that case the complete text of the resolution specifying the agreed behavior is not in WD15. The "Add one of:" part seems to have gone missing. In that case it still needs to be fixed. It is not clear to me which of a or b were selected although I see some negotiation as to details. Was there a complete proposal as revised produced? I have no interest in re-opening the issue, just get me text and the state table can be tweaked accordingly or make a counter proposal to this issue with the changes that you would rather implement. Thanks -bob -----Original Message----- From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 1:12 PM To: Doug Davis Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified, state of sequence is unclear Doug/Bob Yep we had this already. Issue number 111 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i111 Paul Doug Davis wrote: > > Bob, > if a MsgNumRollover fault is generated I don't think the RMD should > necessarily terminate the sequence.There may be other messages, with > lower numbers, that could still be received and processed > successfully. Didn't we discuss this already - it sounds familiar. > -Doug > > > > *"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>* > > 06/26/2006 11:33 AM > > > To > "[WS-RX]" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> > cc > > Subject > [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified, state of sequence is > unclear > > > > > > > > > > *Description* > > WD 15 lines 564-570 state that if the internal limitation for > MessageNumber is exceeded by either RMS or RMS, then a > MessageNumberRollover fault is generated. > Section 4.5 which describes the fault provides no further information > > > *Justification * > > Possibility for protocol lockup or non-interoperable behavior > > > Target: core > > *Proposal: * > > Insert after line 570: > Generation or receipt of a MessageNumberRollover fault MUST > immediately terminate the sequence > > Insert in section 4.5 > > Sent by: RMS or RMD > Condition: message numbers for a Sequence have been exhausted > Action upon Generation or receipt: The Sequence is terminated > immediately. -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf paul@wso2.com "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]