OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx] proposal to address issue 140


Is there a spec you can reference?

Otherwise how is this to be implemented?

Thanks

-bob

 


From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:37 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] proposal to address issue 140

 


Didn't say it doesn't have consequences but they are not controlled by the RM spec.
-Doug


"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>

07/27/2006 03:18 PM

To

Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

cc

"[WS-RX]" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>

Subject

RE: [ws-rx] proposal to address issue 140

 

 

 




A fault without consequence might be best omitted or described as simply informative and if so of what.
Thanks
-bob
 

 



From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent:
Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:23 PM
To:
ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:
RE: [ws-rx] proposal to address issue 140

 

I don't understand what is not clear with that fault.

-Doug

"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>

07/27/2006 01:10 PM

 

To

"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>, "[WS-RX]" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>

cc

 

Subject

RE: [ws-rx] proposal to address issue 140


 

 

 

 





 

Hi Bob/Anish, thanks for producing the proposal.

 
Can the proponents of the MakeConnection solution (or any body else for that matter) suggest text for elucidating the Unsupported Selection fault?

 
- Sanj

 



From: Bob Freund-Hitachi [mailto:bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com]
Sent:
Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 2:59 AM
To:
[WS-RX]
Subject:
[ws-rx] proposal to address issue 140


Anish has been kind enough to prepare the attached draft proposal to address issue 140.

 
While preparing this draft, some additional points were raised which we enumerate below:

 
Sequence Terminated Fault:

There is no text that details under what conditions a sequence terminated fault might be raised other than mention of a vague “protocol error”.

One way to address this is to list some or all of the conditions in section 4, however it is more concise to represent these in the state tables of appendix D were normative.

 
Unsupported Selection

This fault description deserves elucidation

 
Thanks

-bob



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]