ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: pr issue: destination of Seq faults
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:53:22 -0400
resending - forgot Subject.
__________________
From spec:
Line 893
RM Destinations that generate Sequence
faults SHOULD send those faults to the same [destination] as Acknowledgement
messages.
The text is a bit unclear. Does
it mean that sending it is optional or is the EPR it sends it to optional?
I think the intent was just the act of sending it is option, but
it must go to the AcksTo EPR.
Proposal:
RM Destinations that generate Sequence
faults SHOULD transmit those faults. If the fault is transmitted, it MUST
be transmitted to the same [destination] as Acknowledgement messages.
Hopefully, just editoral.
thanks
-Doug
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]