[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Proposals for MakeConnection issues summary
Thanks for the clarification. Let me take another look at the flows. Paul Doug Davis wrote: > > Not at all. The discussions we had back then were around the failure > case when > the connection was no longer around - I'm talking about the case where > the connection > is still there but its not used to send the response - in particular > if it is used to send a CS. > But this gets into my request from Marc to explain how things work in > his proposal because > I still don't see the message flows for some of the very basic > scenarios, see [1]. > > As for reopening a resolved issue.... some phrase revolving around "a > pot" and "a kettle" comes to mind. > Since PR001 can (should) be closed with no action (there is no > composibility issue) I can't think of a > more blatant attempt to reopen a resolve issue than the current MC > threads. > > [1] > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/200611/msg00011.html > > thanks > -Doug > __________________________________________________ > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6906 | dug@us.ibm.com > > > > *Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>* > > 11/15/2006 08:50 AM > > > To > Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > cc > Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>, "ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org" > <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> > Subject > Re: [ws-rx] Proposals for MakeConnection issues summary > > > > > > > > > > Doug > > which has still been unanswered and that's the composibility issue of > > your proposal with WS-Addressing. In particular how it seems to > > violate the definition of what anonymous means. Anonymous is very > > clearly defined to mean the backchannel of the same connection that > > carried the request. I think this needs to be addressed. > We discussed this at length in the TC and this was not the consensus of > this group or the WSA experts advising us. The same applies to the > MC(SequenceID) form which was voted on and approved by this group. Are > you by any chance trying to raise a resolved issue?? :-) > > Paul > > -- > Paul Fremantle > VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle > paul@wso2.com > (646) 290 8050 > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle paul@wso2.com (646) 290 8050 "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]