[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR022: strawman proposal
"Gilbert Pilz"
<gpilz@bea.com>
12/14/2006 03:49 AM |
|
1.) Adding the mandatory LastMsgNumber element to CloseSequence. As previously discussed, the description of LastMsgNumber should be something along the lines of:
The LastMsgNumber element specifies the highest assigned message number of all the Sequence Traffic Messages for the Sequence being closed. The RM Destination can use this information, for example, to implement the behavior indicated by wsrm:CreateSequenceResponse/wsrm:IncompleteSequenceBehavior.
2.) The use of CloseSequence remains optional. Any agreement between the RMS and the RMD about the use of CloseSequence to allow the RMD to determine if it has succesfully received all the messages sent by the RMS is out of scope.
3.) An RMS that sends a CloseSequence but does not receive a CloseSequenceResponse is free to retry the CloseSequence message or not depending upon local policy etc.
- gp
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]