Re: [ws-rx] PR33 - Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue back-channel not defined

[Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com>]

OK, so how about:

Add to the glossary:
Backchannel: When the underlying transport provides a mechanism to return 
a transport-protocol specific response, we refer to this mechanism as a 
backchannel.

Matt

Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> wrote on 13/12/2006 21:15:33:

> Matt
> 
> I still don't agree that this is right. I think there may be cases where 

> there is a new transport level connection. The main point is that the 
> response channel is transport-defined not WS-A defined.
> 
> Paul
> 
> Matthew Lovett wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I found the last suggestion a bit cumbersome, so I has another go. I 
hope 
> > people like it :)
> >
> > Add to the glossary:
> > Backchannel: When the underlying transport provides a mechanism to 
return 
> > a transport-protocol specific response without initiating a new 
> > connection, we refer to this mechanism as a backchannel.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> 
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
> (646) 290 8050
> 
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> 
>