OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR33 - Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue back-channel not defined


Chris

On the call last week I explained how we are using SMTP in this manner 
to do interop between Axis2 and .NET with RM for the Danish Government. 
Maybe you had left early by that point.
Its concrete.

Paul

Christopher B Ferris wrote:
>
> -1!
>
> It is important that we preserve the "without initiating a new 
> connection" aspect.
>
> Paul, unless you can come up with something more specific than: "I 
> think there may be..."
> then I see no reason to relax the definition as in this latest 
> revision from Matt.
>
> I would prefer we went with:
>
> Backchannel: When the underlying transport provides a mechanism to return
> a transport-protocol specific response without initiating a new 
> connection,
> we refer to this mechanism as a backchannel.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
>
>
> *Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>*
>
> 12/14/2006 11:26 AM
>
> 	
> To
> 	Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com>
> cc
> 	ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject
> 	Re: [ws-rx] PR33 - Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue back-channel not defined
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> +1
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paul
>
> Matthew Lovett wrote:
> > OK, so how about:
> >
> > Add to the glossary:
> > Backchannel: When the underlying transport provides a mechanism to 
> return
> > a transport-protocol specific response, we refer to this mechanism as a
> > backchannel.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> wrote on 13/12/2006 21:15:33:
> >
> >  
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> I still don't agree that this is right. I think there may be cases 
> where
> >>    
> >
> >  
> >> there is a new transport level connection. The main point is that the
> >> response channel is transport-defined not WS-A defined.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> Matthew Lovett wrote:
> >>    
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I found the last suggestion a bit cumbersome, so I has another go. I
> >>>      
> > hope
> >  
> >>> people like it :)
> >>>
> >>> Add to the glossary:
> >>> Backchannel: When the underlying transport provides a mechanism to
> >>>      
> > return
> >  
> >>> a transport-protocol specific response without initiating a new
> >>> connection, we refer to this mechanism as a backchannel.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Matt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >> --
> >> Paul Fremantle
> >> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
> >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> >>
> >> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> >> paul@wso2.com
> >> (646) 290 8050
> >>
> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >
> >
> >  
>
> -- 
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
> (646) 290 8050
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
>
>

-- 
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
(646) 290 8050

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]