ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] RM Assertion -- Issue 37 -- once again
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:51:50 -0500
Ashok,
I assumed that the semantics
of what I put into CD05 was the same as your proposal. I didn't think
collapsing the 3 outlines into one would change the meaning. Sorry
if it does. I'll work on splitting them out into 3 tonight. All
- since I'm going to be in there anyway, if you noticed any typos please
send them ASAP so I can add those as well.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
"Ashok Malhotra"
<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
02/05/2007 09:04 AM
|
To
| wsrx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [ws-rx] RM Assertion -- Issue 37 --
once again |
|
On the Jan 25 telcon, the TC accepted my proposal
for the RM assertions. I've omitted the URLs for the proposal and
the minutes since the note was getting truncated there.
The latest draft of the RM Policy document, however, does not reflect the
decision correctly.
Section 2.2 shows the outline for the RM assertion (DA assertion removed
for brevity).
<wsrmp:RMAssertion [wsp:Optional="true"]? ... >
<wsp:Policy>
[ <wsrmp:SequenceSTR/> |
<wsrmp:SequenceTransportSecurity/> ] ?
</wsp:Policy>
...
</wsrmp:RMAssertion>
The Sequence Transport Security Assertion described in section 2.5.2, does
not follow this outline.
<wsp:Policy>
<wsp:>ExactlyOne>
<wsp:All>
<wsrm:RMAssertion [wsp:Optional="true"]> ...>
<wsp:Policy>
<wsrmp:SequenceTransportSecurity/>
</wsp:Policy>
</wsrm:RMAssertion>
<sp:TransportBinding ...>
...
</sp:TransportBinding>
<wsp:All>
<wsp:ExactlyOne>
</wsp:Policy>
The proposal that was accepted by the TC recommended that the RM assertion
be described in 3 flavors and all the flavors be described in a single
section. This should be implemented.
All the best, Ashok
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]