I think 1.b would be the easiest thing to do. The spec
doesn’t really mention using that attribute as it is. Certainly nothing
would prevent its use if it isn’t present in the WSDL we provide. I don’t have any objections over 1.a though. Just
my $0.02.
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 4:44 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] wsaw vs wsam
Marc noticed
that the RM and MC specs reference the WSA WSDL Binding spec (wsaw) instead of
the new WSA Metadata spec (wsam). The references are in the prefix table
and in the wsdl docs. There are two ways to deal with this:
1 - treat it as
editorial and I can produce new version of the docs ASAP. There are two
options here:
1a. replace wsaw with wsam where appropriate
1b. remove wsaw entirely and don't have any mention of the wsam:Action
attribute at all.
2 - open a new
issue and have the TC approve/resolve the issue on the call
Obvious doing
one of the 1's would still allow us to vote (hopefully) on the CDs tomorrow.
2 may or may not allow that - not sure. How would the TC like to
proceed?
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com