[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Groups - Latest Editors WSRX Files (Latest WSRX.zip)uploaded
In that case, shouldn't the normative reference point to the CR version not the member submission? Or at least to the LC draft. -Anish -- Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > WS-Policy 1.5 Framework and Attachment specs are in Candidate > Recommendation status > as of yesterday. > > Is that "not far enough along in the standards process"? Basically, > there are two stages remaining. > PR and REC. The CR phase is the Call for Implementations phase. The WG > has identified exit > criteria of 4 interoperating implementations of each of the features of > the specs with the exclusion of > 4 features that require only 2. As of this week, we have 2 published > endpoints that are interoperating > on the set of interop test scenarios defined for the first 3 rounds of > the interop scenarios. > > To me, that suggests that the specs are far enough along in the > standards process to be referenced. > The namespace is final (unless the specs revert to Working Draft) in the > CR. > > When we went though the CR transition, it was pretty clear that the > changes made to the specs > since the Last Call were of a non-substantive nature (e.g. no features > added or removed). The most significant > change was to the namespace itself. > > Must we go through another review period just to change a reference from > the LC draft to the CR? I certainly > hope not. > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris > phone: +1 508 377 9295 > > "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote on 03/01/2007 > 12:51:45 PM: > > > Martin means CR. WS-Policy CR was approved recently. Perhaps even > yesterday. > > > > All the best, Ashok > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 9:43 AM > > > To: dug@us.ibm.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Groups - Latest Editors WSRX Files (Latest > WSRX.zip) > > > uploaded > > > > > > Sorry if this is a late comment, but the normative ws-policy > reference in > > > wsrmp seems inappropriate to me. > > > The charter says: > > > > > > The TC will not attempt to define functionality duplicating that > of any > > > normatively referenced specification in the input > > > WS-ReliableMessaging or WS-RM Policy specifications. If the > referenced > > > specification is outside of a standardization > > > process at the time this TC moves to ratify its deliverables, or > is not > > > far along enough in the standardization process, > > > any normative references to it in the TC output will be expressed > in an > > > abstract manner, and the incarnation will be left > > > at that time as an exercise in interoperability. > > > > > > I don't believe in this case the member submission is "far along > enough" > > > since there is a Last Call version. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Martin. > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: dug@us.ibm.com [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] > > > >Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 4:18 PM > > > >To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > > > >Subject: [ws-rx] Groups - Latest Editors WSRX Files (Latest > > > >WSRX.zip) uploaded > > > > > > > > > > > >The document revision named Latest Editors WSRX Files (Latest > > > >WSRX.zip) has been submitted by Mr. Doug Davis to the OASIS > > > >Web Services Reliable Exchange (WS-RX) TC document repository. > > > > This document is revision #44 of Latest WSRX.zip. > > > > > > > >Document Description: > > > > > > > > > > > >View Document Details: > > > >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/document.php > > > >?document_id=22657 > > > > > > > >Download Document: > > > >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php > > > /22657/Latest%20WSRX.zip > > > > > > Revision: > > > This document is revision #44 of Latest WSRX.zip. The document details > > > page referenced above will show the complete revision history. > > > > > > > > > PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email > > > application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be > able to > > > copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of > your web > > > browser. > > > > > > -OASIS Open Administration > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]