Re: [ws-rx] call today?

27^th may fine by me to.

In considering closing the TC, our specs were approved on February 2009, so there are two relevant questions:

1. Has anyone found any bugs and kept them quite? (mostly a rhetorical question)

2. Has there been any interop testing between different vendors, or are there any live systems interoperating between different vendor products?

Martin.

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 15 April 2010 14:12
To: Paul Fremantle
Cc: ws-rx
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] call today?

May 27th is fine with me.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>

04/15/2010 09:09 AM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	ws-rx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	Re: [ws-rx] call today?

Doug

The maximum period is basically unimportant at this point, because its about making people who have recently lost status get it back. AFAIK this doesn't apply to anyone based on our attendance records.

How about 27th May?

Paul

On 15 April 2010 14:03, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> wrote:

May 13th might be hard for some people because there's a WSRA F2F that day.
I think the last meeting was Oct 15th - what's the maximum allowed waiting period between meetings?

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>

04/15/2010 08:45 AM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [ws-rx] call today?

Actually we are meant to. Unfortunately its going to be hard for me to run it today, or next week. Can I propose a new date in May: May 13th? I think before the call it would be good to have some email discussion about winding up the TC. Thoughts?

Paul

On 15 April 2010 12:58, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> wrote:

Do we have an RX call today?

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

--
Paul Fremantle
CTO and Co-Founder, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair, VP, Apache Synapse

Office: +44 844 484 8143
Cell: +44 798 447 4618

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
twitter.com/pzfreo
paul@wso2.com

wso2.com Lean Enterprise Middleware

Disclaimer: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information and is intended exclusively for the addressee/s. If you are not the intended recipient/s, or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received and in addition, you should not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained in this communication. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.

--
Paul Fremantle
CTO and Co-Founder, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair, VP, Apache Synapse

Office: +44 844 484 8143
Cell: +44 798 447 4618

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
twitter.com/pzfreo
paul@wso2.com

wso2.com Lean Enterprise Middleware

Disclaimer: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information and is intended exclusively for the addressee/s. If you are not the intended recipient/s, or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received and in addition, you should not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained in this communication. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.

ws-rx message