OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-sx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Issue 25: Chap. 6.5 [Token protection] conflicts with chapter 8.3 and 8.4.


This is now logged as issue 25.

Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ 


-----Original Message-----
From: Dittmann, Werner [mailto:werner.dittmann@siemens.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:06 AM
To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Marc Goodner
Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Chap. 6.5 [Token protection] conflicts with
chapter 8.3 and 8.4.

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL
THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.

The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.

Protocol:  ws-sp
ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r03-diff.pdf

Artifact:  spec

Type: design

Title: Chap. 6.5 [Token protection] conflicts with chapter 8.3 and 8.4.

Description:

If the policy uses EndorsingSupportingTokens _and_ sets [Token
Protection] then I have the same behaviour as defined for
SignedEndorsingSupportingTokens. Is that true? 

On the other hand if I use SignedEndorsingSupportingTokens and do
_not_ set [Token Protection] - what should be the result in that case?

Related issues:


Proposed Resolution:
Clarify behaviour of these interdependencies.


Werner Dittmann
Siemens COM MN CC BD TO
mailto:Werner.Dittmann@siemens.com
Tel:   +49(0)89 636 50265
Mobil: +49(0)172 85 85 245


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]