RE: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type?

["Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>]

Comments lines

Cheers

Gudge 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: 09 February 2006 20:45
> To: Dittmann, Werner; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the 
> same type?
> 
> This is now logged as issue 28.
> 
> Marc Goodner
> Technical Diplomat
> Microsoft Corporation
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dittmann, Werner [mailto:werner.dittmann@siemens.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:13 AM
> To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: Marc Goodner
> Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Multiple supporting tokens of the 
> same type?
> 
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL
> THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
> 
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
> 
> Protocol:  ws-sp
> ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r03-diff.pdf
> 
> Artifact:  spec
> 
> Type: design
> 
> Title: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type?
> 
> Description:
> 
> Can a Policy have more than one supporting token (of the same type),
> e.g. multiple SupportingTokens or multiple EndorsingSupportingTokens?

[MJG]
Yes.

> 
> Related issues:
> none
> 
> Proposed Resolution:
> 
> IMHO we need an "overall" ws-sp outline to define which assertions are
> allowed at a specific level, for example similar to 
> (a)symmetric binding
> outline but for to top level policy file.

[MJG]
The intent of Appendix A ( and other text in the spec that talks to the
scope of the various assertions ) is to specify which assertions can
appear on which WSDL constructs. I'm not sure it makes any sense to
specify such things in terms of location in a policy file...

> 
> Werner Dittmann
> Siemens COM MN CC BD TO
> mailto:Werner.Dittmann@siemens.com
> Tel:   +49(0)89 636 50265
> Mobil: +49(0)172 85 85 245
>