OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
ws-sx
129 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Error in the WS-SecurityPolicy Schema
From
"Symon Chang" <schang@bluetitan.com> on 31 Mar 2006 23:19:15 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 48: more background
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 31 Mar 2006 23:13:36 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 48: more background
From
"Symon Chang" <schang@bluetitan.com> on 31 Mar 2006 22:53:19 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 48: more background
From
"Tony Gullotta" <tony.gullotta@soa.com> on 31 Mar 2006 22:45:08 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 48: more background
From
"Gene Thurston" <gthurston@amberpoint.com> on 31 Mar 2006 22:10:46 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 48: more background
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 31 Mar 2006 22:01:08 -0000
Issue 48: more background
From
"Tony Gullotta" <tony.gullotta@soa.com> on 31 Mar 2006 18:41:33 -0000
Issue 55: Clarification on RequireDerivedKeys and X509Token under AsymmetricBinding
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 31 Mar 2006 15:31:22 -0000
Issue 54: [ Clarification on Signature Protection property and various SupportingTokens]
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 31 Mar 2006 15:30:49 -0000
Issue 53: Message parts to be protected using BootstrapPolicy
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 31 Mar 2006 15:30:48 -0000
NEW Issue: Clarification on RequireDerivedKeys and X509Token underAsymmetricBinding
From
Venu <K.Venugopal@Sun.COM> on 31 Mar 2006 14:30:49 -0000
NEW Issue: [ Clarification on Signature Protection property andvarious SupportingTokens]
From
Venu <K.Venugopal@Sun.COM> on 31 Mar 2006 13:05:54 -0000
NEW Issue: Message parts to be protected using BootstrapPolicy
From
Venu <K.Venugopal@Sun.COM> on 31 Mar 2006 12:38:38 -0000
Proposal for AI-2006-03-29-03 / Issue 41: Clarification on token propagation of SCT required
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 31 Mar 2006 11:26:35 -0000
Encrypting passwords
From
"Tony Gullotta" <tony.gullotta@soa.com> on 31 Mar 2006 05:52:52 -0000
Issue 52: Add single request for multiple tokens to WS-Trust
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 31 Mar 2006 04:56:22 -0000
Re: New Issue: Add single request for multiple tokens to WS-Trust
From
Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> on 31 Mar 2006 04:01:12 -0000
New Issue: Add single request for multiple tokens to WS-Trust
From
Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> on 31 Mar 2006 03:59:07 -0000
[VER 2] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 28 2006
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Mar 2006 23:03:12 -0000
Groups - WS-SX F2F (Austin) modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 29 Mar 2006 22:55:04 -0000
Groups - WS-SX F2F (Austin) modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 29 Mar 2006 22:53:48 -0000
Proposed Agenda and final logistics for F2F
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 29 Mar 2006 20:09:55 -0000
WS-SX Issue list updated - Revision: 16
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Mar 2006 17:31:24 -0000
[VER 1] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 28 2006
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Mar 2006 16:01:56 -0000
REVISED Proposal: i018 Absolute XPath expressions
From
Michael McIntosh <mikemci@us.ibm.com> on 29 Mar 2006 15:25:54 -0000
REVISED Proposal: i016 sp:SignedParts mechanism
From
Michael McIntosh <mikemci@us.ibm.com> on 29 Mar 2006 15:25:54 -0000
Issue 44 - Authorization Token
From
Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com> on 29 Mar 2006 15:21:22 -0000
Issue 51: sp:RequireDerivedKeys is underspecified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Mar 2006 14:57:55 -0000
NEW ISSUE: sp:RequireDerivedKeys is underspecified
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 29 Mar 2006 09:42:11 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] WS SX Additional Interop Scenarios
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 28 Mar 2006 21:31:13 -0000
WS-SX Issue list updated - Revision: 15
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Mar 2006 19:11:44 -0000
New copies of WS-SX specs for review
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Mar 2006 19:10:47 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 28 Mar 2006 00:24:20 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 27 Mar 2006 21:49:58 -0000
Reminder, the US is not on Daylight Savings Time yet
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 27 Mar 2006 21:40:09 -0000
Editors AI-09: 2006-01-18
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 27 Mar 2006 19:30:33 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] WS SX Additional Interop Scenarios
From
Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com> on 27 Mar 2006 18:53:14 -0000
[VER 2] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 22 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 26 Mar 2006 13:50:25 -0000
Austin F2F Attendance Ballot
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 24 Mar 2006 17:16:34 -0000
Any Austin F2F special dietary needs?
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 24 Mar 2006 16:55:17 -0000
WS-SX Issue list updated - Revision: 14
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 19:18:42 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 22 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 18:21:55 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 22 2006
From
"Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> on 22 Mar 2006 17:37:39 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 48: Proposal
From
"Tony Gullotta" <tony.gullotta@soa.com> on 22 Mar 2006 17:08:30 -0000
WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 22 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 16:23:42 -0000
AW: [ws-sx] Issue 31: Clarification for UsernameToken assertion
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 22 Mar 2006 15:00:43 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] Issue 33: Identity security header components that areencrypted when using (A)Symmetric binding
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:26:02 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 31: Clarification for UsernameToken assertion
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:24:59 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 48: Proposal
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 13:49:57 -0000
WG: UML Model for Web Service Security Policy
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 22 Mar 2006 11:13:26 -0000
AI-2005-03-08-06 - Jan Alexander to supply clarifying text for Issue 038
From
"Jan Alexander" <janalex@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 03:39:15 -0000
Groups - Additional Interop scenarios (wx-sx-additional-interop-00.doc) uploaded
From
prateek.mishra@oracle.com on 21 Mar 2006 20:35:09 -0000
Groups - ws-sx-interop-draft-01.doc (SX-Interop.doc) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 21 Mar 2006 19:13:04 -0000
WS SX Additional Interop Scenarios
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 21 Mar 2006 17:41:32 -0000
AW: [ws-sx] RE: Response to Issue 30 Proposal ( was Proposal for ACTION-2006-03-01-04)
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 21 Mar 2006 06:52:23 -0000
RE: Response to Issue 30 Proposal ( was Proposal for ACTION-2006-03-01-04)
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 20 Mar 2006 18:14:17 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 20 Mar 2006 18:11:47 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 33: Identity security header components that are encrypted when using (A)Symmetric binding
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 20 Mar 2006 11:32:51 -0000
AW: Response to Issue 30 Proposal ( was Proposal for ACTION-2006-03-01-04)
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 20 Mar 2006 07:56:41 -0000
Issue 33: Identify security header components that are encrypted
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 19 Mar 2006 22:54:19 -0000
Response to Issue 30 Proposal ( was Proposal for ACTION-2006-03-01-04)
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 19 Mar 2006 22:35:12 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 15 Mar 2006 23:38:49 -0000
Issue list updated - rev 13
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 22:31:54 -0000
Issue 48: Proposal
From
"Tony Gullotta" <tony.gullotta@soa.com> on 15 Mar 2006 20:21:35 -0000
WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 15 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 19:46:12 -0000
F2F Dial In - still need sponsors or there will not be one
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 15 Mar 2006 16:59:01 -0000
Issue list updated - rev 12
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 07:43:55 -0000
Issue 50: Clarify scope of Protection Assertions
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 05:14:13 -0000
Issue 49: Clarify [Algorithm Suite] when used with Transport Binding
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 05:07:45 -0000
Issue 48: Binding Assertions should support Operation subjects
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 05:01:58 -0000
Issue 47: Does IssuedTokenOverTransport require client-side digital signature?
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 04:47:37 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 27: When to include a token?
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 02:31:43 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Clarify scope of Protection Assertions
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 02:20:47 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 46: Include BinarySecurityToken as an additional token assertion in WS-SP
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 19:40:52 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] Issue 46: Include BinarySecurityToken as an additionaltoken assertion in WS-SP
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 14 Mar 2006 19:33:57 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Clarify [Algorithm Suite] when used with Transport Binding
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 19:13:54 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] Use-Case and Proposed Solution for i010 (long)
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 14 Mar 2006 18:36:05 -0000
NEW Issue: Binding Assertions should support Operation subjects
From
"Tony Gullotta" <tony.gullotta@soa.com> on 14 Mar 2006 17:16:50 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Use-Case and Proposed Solution for i010 (long)
From
"Jan Alexander" <janalex@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 17:12:48 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 32: Deriving keys from passwords
From
"Hal Lockhart" <hlockhar@bea.com> on 14 Mar 2006 15:41:22 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 32: Deriving keys from passwords
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 04:40:57 -0000
Proposal for dealing with Issue 40
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 00:14:40 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 13 Mar 2006 22:17:58 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Does IssuedTokenOverTransport require client-side digitalsignature?
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 13 Mar 2006 21:31:14 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] Use-Case and Proposed Solution for i010 (long)
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 13 Mar 2006 19:51:04 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 46: Include BinarySecurityToken as an additional token assertion in WS-SP
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 10 Mar 2006 00:38:00 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 9 Mar 2006 16:22:20 -0000
[VER 2] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 08 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 8 Mar 2006 22:52:04 -0000
STS WSDL for SX Interop scenarios
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Mar 2006 19:45:02 -0000
Issue list updated - rev 11
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Mar 2006 19:25:59 -0000
Issue 46: Include BinarySecurityToken as an additional token assertion in WS-SP
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Mar 2006 18:24:24 -0000
Issue 45: Duplicate Id attribute values in Security Context example
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Mar 2006 18:20:56 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Include BinarySecurityToken as an additional token assertionin WS-SP
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 8 Mar 2006 17:19:34 -0000
NEW Issue: Duplicate Id attribute values in Security Context example
From
Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> on 8 Mar 2006 17:06:33 -0000
Proposed resolution for issue - i036 - "Clarify term pre-authentication"
From
Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> on 8 Mar 2006 16:50:05 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] Issue 44: What is an authorization token?
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 8 Mar 2006 16:40:44 -0000
WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 08 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 8 Mar 2006 16:31:25 -0000
Austin F2F Ballot FINAL REMINDER
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 8 Mar 2006 16:24:27 -0000
NEW ISSUE: What is an authorization token?
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 7 Mar 2006 13:08:22 -0000
Proposal for ACTION-2006-03-01-04
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 7 Mar 2006 12:01:36 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon cancelled
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 6 Mar 2006 19:06:30 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 6 Mar 2006 19:01:47 -0000
Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified
From
klawrenc@us.ibm.com on 6 Mar 2006 19:00:46 -0000
Issue list updated - rev 10
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 6 Mar 2006 16:42:45 -0000
[VER 2] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 01 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 5 Mar 2006 21:12:49 -0000
Issue 43: Missing enumeration for validate request type in the RequestTypeEnum definition
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 5 Mar 2006 16:08:39 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 41: Clarification on token propagation of SCT required
From
"Jan Alexander" <janalex@microsoft.com> on 3 Mar 2006 20:41:53 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 41: Clarification on token propagation of SCT required
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 3 Mar 2006 09:36:54 -0000
AW: [ws-sx] Issue 27: When to include a token?
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 3 Mar 2006 08:44:56 -0000
NEW Issue: Missing enumeration for validate request type in the RequestTypeEnumdefinition
From
Ruchith Fernando <ruchith@wso2.com> on 3 Mar 2006 07:30:16 -0000
Anyone able to sponsor a call-in number for the F2F?
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 23:16:00 -0000
draft minutes for Feb 21, WSS Conference Call (w/o attendance)
From
Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com> on 2 Mar 2006 18:09:47 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Use-Case and Proposed Solution for i010
From
"Jan Alexander" <janalex@microsoft.com> on 2 Mar 2006 17:40:02 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 41: Clarification on token propagation of SCT required
From
"Jan Alexander" <janalex@microsoft.com> on 2 Mar 2006 17:35:54 -0000
REMINDER: Pls vote in the F2F attendance ballot
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 17:14:21 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 01 2006
From
Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 02:30:44 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 01 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 1 Mar 2006 18:04:59 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 01 2006
From
"Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu> on 1 Mar 2006 17:13:23 -0000
WS-SX TC Minutes, Mar 01 2006
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 1 Mar 2006 16:59:23 -0000
ACTION REQUIRED F2F Ballot - please vote
From
Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com> on 1 Mar 2006 15:54:31 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 42: WS-SC HTTP Binding
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 1 Mar 2006 15:06:22 -0000
Re: [ws-sx] Issue 42: WS-SC HTTP Binding
From
Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> on 1 Mar 2006 15:06:17 -0000
AW: [ws-sx] Issue 27: When to include a token?
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 1 Mar 2006 14:50:51 -0000
AW: [ws-sx] Issue 27: When to include a token?
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 1 Mar 2006 14:42:36 -0000
AW: [ws-sx] Issue 30: Need a mechanism to identify token assertions
From
"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann@siemens.com> on 1 Mar 2006 14:28:15 -0000
WSDL for SX Interop scenarios
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Mar 2006 14:25:33 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 30: Need a mechanism to identify token assertions
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 1 Mar 2006 13:00:56 -0000
RE: [ws-sx] Issue 27: When to include a token?
From
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> on 1 Mar 2006 12:19:13 -0000
Issue 21 proposal to correct SP section number references
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Mar 2006 05:42:56 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2