[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 21 proposal to correct SP section number references
All, Here is what I have found regarding the SP section number
problems. I know this would be much easier to parse inline in the doc, but for
now here are the details on the changes needed. In short most of the section numbers needed to be
renumbered 1 less than the current value after the reordering. I found several
cases where the number was OK. I found several others where the section number
was just wrong. Below I’ve noted the line number and whether the section
number there is OK, the correct value, or when the existing value was off from
more than just the section reordering the current value and what it should be. Line 14 - OK Line 217 – 3 Lines 244 to 246 – OK Line 354 – 3.14 Line 358 – 3.15 Line 558 – 6.3 Line 1249 – 7 Line 1250 – 7 Line 1363 – 6.1 Line 1447 – 6.7 Line 1471 – 6.2, should be 6.7 Line 1514 – 8.1, should be 6.1 Line 1518 – 8.2, should be 6.7 Line 1584 – 8.1, should be 6.1 Line 1588 – 8.2, should be 6.7 Line 1648 – 8.1, should be 6.1 Line 1652 – 8.2, should be 6.7 Line 1728 – 7.1 Line 1731 – 4.1.1 Line 1735 – 4.1.2 Line 1739 – 4.4.1 Line 1742 – 5.2.1, should be 4.2.2 Line 1779 – 7.1 Line 1782 – 4.1.1 Line 1786 – 4.1.2 Line 1790 – 4.4.1 Line 1793 – 5.2.1, should be 4.2.2 Line 1831 – 7.1 Line 1834 – 4.1.1 Line 1838 – 4.1.2 Line 1842 – 4.4.1 Line 1845 – 5.2.1, should be 4.2.2 Line 1885 – 7.1 Line 1888 – 4.1.1 Line 1892 – 4.1.2 Line 1896 – 4.4.1 Line 1899 – 5.2.1, should be 4.2.2 Line 2086 – 6 Appendix A – All section numbers here reduced by 1 Line 2269 – OK Line 2304 – OK Marc Goodner Technical Diplomat Microsoft Corporation Tel: (425) 703-1903 Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]