ws-sx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, Oct 4th 2006
- From: Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com>
- To: Greg Carpenter <gregcarp@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:31:59 -0500
Small correction, my Action is to update
the TC homepage which is actually public.
Cheers
Kelvin
Greg Carpenter <gregcarp@microsoft.com>
10/04/2006 01:10 PM
|
To
| "ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org"
<ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, Oct 4th 2006 |
|
Summary of new Action Items:
AI-2006-10-04-01 Kelvin to update
TC members only web with Public review info
AI-2006-10-04-02 Marc to delve
into TC document organization issues and report back.
1. Call to order/roll call
Present:
TBD
2. Reading/Approving minutes of last
meeting - September 27 2006
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/email/archives/200609/msg00058.html
Adopted unanimously.
3. TC Logistics (10 minutes or less)
Proposed that there no need for
a December face-to-face - no objection
Group should think about a possible
January date and be prepared to provide feedback by the end of the
month
4. Issues list
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/issues/Issues.xml
a) Review of action items
AI-2006-09-06-01 - Gudge to make proposal
for issue 90 by end of September
Closed
b) Issues in Review status
None.
c) New issues
None.
d) Active issues
i066 - SecurityPolicy use cases
Next draft underway. Waiting
for clarification from Tony N regarding processing model concerns. i066
and i101 are linked by similar processing model concerns.
i081 - Provide policy statements and
associated URIs that can be referenced from wsp:PolicyReference statements
Linked to i066
i090 - Description of Strict Formatting
seems wrong for EncryptedKey
Currently the strict formatting layout
is different for WSS 1.0 and 1.1. Does it really need to be?
i096 - Ensure Appendix A is complete
Marc will submit an update in the next
day or two. Change status to pending.
i101 - Need additional SamlToken Assertion
Elements for Holder-of-Key and Sender-Vouches
Linked to i066 and processing
model concerns. Waiting for clarification from Tony N.
PR001 - Question on WS-Trust sections
4.3.5 to 4.3.7
Marc to submit proposed changes to
the list.
f) Pending issues
i083 - Remove shading from figures,
possibly enlarge
i086 - No policy support for content
encryption?
i110 - QName support for specifying
elements that need to be present in the message
All of the above pending issues will
be addressed in the impending SP update
5. AOB
Chair asked who would be prepared to
participate in an SP interop. Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and Layer7 responded
in the affirmative. Tony N stated that IBM's response applied to
scenarios in the existing interop doc and any additional ones would be
considered optional
6. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]