RE: [ws-sx] Issue 116: Is Appendix D Normative?

["Hal Lockhart" <hlockhar@bea.com>]

Ok, then where specifically does rule D.4 #3 come from? (for example)

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 10:55 AM
> To: Marc Goodner; Hal Lockhart; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 116: Is Appendix D Normative?
> 
> I've looked into this and Appendix D was added to SP per issue 33.
> 
> From Gudge's accepted proposal for that issue:
> "I think this information belongs in an appendix, as it's really a
> collation of existing material."
> 
> So Appendix D is not normative and the material does exist elsewhere.
I
> believe 116 can be closed with no action.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 6:33 AM
> To: Hal Lockhart; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 116: Is Appendix D Normative?
> 
> Issue 116
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hlockhar@bea.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:12 PM
> To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: Marc Goodner
> Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Is Appendix D Normative?
> 
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL
> THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
> 
> Protocol:  ws-sp
> 
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20578/ws-securitypolic
> y-1.2-spec-ed-01-r10-diff.pdf
> 
> Artifact:  spec
> 
> Type:
> 
> editorial
> 
> Title:
> 
> Is Appendix D normative or is it just a summary of information found
> elsewhere in the spec as Appendix A is?
> 
> Description:
> 
> The last sentence of section 1 says "Section 11, all examples and all
> Appendices are non-normative." That suggests that Appendix D is a
> summary of normative information which is found elsewhere. However, I
> can not find any other source of the information in WS-SP. If Appendix
D
> is non-normative, then I question why it is in the document at all.
> 
> Note that Appendix A explicitly says it is non-normative, suggesting
> that some Appendices may be. Appendix B could conceivably be
considered
> normative, it is hard to tell. Appendix C is examples, so it seems
safe
> to assume they are not normative, however it might be good to say
> explicitly that if Appendix C conflicts with section 6.7 then 6.7
takes
> precedence.
> 
> Related issues:
> 
> My previous issue.
> 
> Proposed Resolution:
> 
> Clarify which Appendices are normative.