Re: [ws-tx] Committee Draft Number

[Thomas Freund <tjfreund@us.ibm.com>]

Done for WS-BA ... updated the line as "Committee Draft 01, March 15 2006" (i.e. no revision at this point).

Regards
Tom
Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>

Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>

03/20/2006 03:23 AM

To	"Ram Jeyaraman" <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
cc	ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [ws-tx] Committee Draft Number

Ram, this refers to the 3rd text line on the title page of each spec and I
think you are correct.
Editors, please could you update the committee drafts as illustrated by
Ram.

The next working draft produced by any editor should also have a revision
number on this line, incremented from the value of the previous WD.

Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com


                                                                         
            "Ram Jeyaraman"                                              
            <Ram.Jeyaraman@mi                                            
            crosoft.com>                                               To
                                      <ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org>        
            20/03/2006 00:00                                           cc
                                                                         
                                                                  Subject
                                      [ws-tx] Committee Draft Number      
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         
                                                                         




Ian, Eric,

The top-level information in the uploaded committee drafts currently state:

“Committee Draft, March 15, 2006”

Should we not also include the number as indicated below?

         “Committee Draft 01, March 15, 2006”

Thank you.