[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: NEW ISSUE: Protocol event indications are not ws-addressing faults
Nature of Problem: With the resolution of Issue 52, the specifications (coord, at, ba) have two kinds of indicaitons: Faults (definined in ws coord) which map to ws-addressing fault model. "notifications" (from ws at, ba) which do not map to ws addressing faults, and which are treated as first class "requests" from ws addressiing perspective. Mapping the second kind of indication to a soap fault, but not a ws addressing fault, will inevitably cause confustion for implementers of this spec. Proposed solution: Instead of mapping the "notificaitons" to soap fault syntax, define a new schema type {ProtocolEventIndication) which conveys the proper syntax for the contents of these protocol notifications. Have each individual protocolEventIndication be mapped to this new syntax, as a proper ws addressing request message. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]