Issue 099 - WS-C/WS-AT: Use of wsa:Action should be clarified

[Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>]

This issue is identified as 099.

 

Please use the subject line for future correspondence on this issue: "Issue 099 - WS-C/WS-AT: Use of wsa:Action should be clarified".

 

From: Ram Jeyaraman [mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 7:36 PM
To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-tx] NEW Issue - WS-C/WS-AT: Use of wsa:Action should be clarified

 

Protocol: WS-Coordination, WS-AT

 

Artifact:  spec
 
Draft:  PR drafts
 
Link to the document referenced:

 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20241/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-pr-01.doc

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20224/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-pr-01.doc

Section and PDF line number: See description below.

Issue type: Design

Related issues: None
 
Issue Description:

 

WS-Coordination implies in section 7 that [action] values are put in messages.  But in line 88, the text “if an action URI is used…”.  Line 408 says “fault MUST include as the [action] property…”.  This seems to lead to inconsistency in when an action must appear. 

 

Proposed resolution:

 

WS-Coordination, Section 1.5, line 88, remove the phrase “if an action URI is used then”. Thus, by enforcing use of wsa:Action uniformly, potential inconsistencies may be avoided.

 

WS-AT, Section 1.3 line 68, the phrase “if an action URI is used then”.