OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-implement message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example


Yes, bpws should be defined as:

xmlns:bpws="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/";
(see Appendix D - XSD Schemas).

Examples in the spec also define it that way (see for example 16.1.2).

I think the spec uses "bpws" in many places as a shortcut for referring
to the namespace URI, without mentioning the fact that the "bpws" prefix
is arbitrary.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kristofer Agren [mailto:kagren@pakalert.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:35 PM
> To: 'bpel implementation'
> Cc: Ugo Corda
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example
> 
> 
> 
> Another question about the validity of the loan approval 
> BPEL; the loan approval example makes a number of called to 
> bpws:getVariableData, but the prefix "bpws" is not mapped to 
> any namespace. 
> 
> I have not found a definite answer to this in the 
> specification, where it is simply stated that the prefix is 
> "bpws" is associated with the BPEL namespace (section 9.1), 
> but it is not mentioned whether this is an assumption that 
> applies to all BPEL files (without having to do an
> xmlns:bpws="...") or just to the examples in the 
> specification. I would like to think that any namespace 
> prefix should be properly defined before used, even those 
> that are used to refer to extension functions?
> 
> Kristofer
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:33 PM
> To: Kristofer Agren; bpel implementation
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example
> 
> I agree. The Partner Link Type Schema specifies 
> elementFormDeafult="qualified", so all the local names must 
> be qualified. The syntax specified in BPEL sec. 7.1 is also 
> quite clear.
> 
> Ugo
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kristofer Agren [mailto:kagren@pakalert.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 12:50 PM
> > To: 'bpel implementation'
> > Subject: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > There appears to be an error in the loanapproval.wsdl and
> > loanapprovalBound.wsdl files; the <portType> element under 
> > <plnk:role> is not in the partner link namespace:
> > 
> >   <plnk:role name="assessor">
> >     <portType name="asns:riskAssessmentPT"/>
> >   </plnk:role>   
> > 
> > Maybe I am missing something, but it should it not be:
> > 
> >   <plnk:role name="assessor">
> >     <plnk:portType name="asns:riskAssessmentPT"/>
> >   </plnk:role>   
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Kristofer
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]