OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-spec-edit message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today



Hi, all,

Just finished the conf call, I will grab the pen after Kevin, Prasad and Kartha  ...
to fix a number of issues in both main spec and XSD which are discovered right before the Dec F2F

Thanks!

Regards,
Alex Yiu


Satish Thatte wrote:
Wow; this will be a short call :-)  Current volunteers

Kevin:  145, 155, 171

Prasad: 162, 167

Kartha: 170

I would like to spend a few minutes to revisit 170 just so I am clear on
it.  Tried to look at WSDL for a few minutes this morning and things
were not obvious to me there.

Satish

-----Original Message-----
From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 8:41 AM
To: Liu, Kevin; Satish Thatte; bpel spec
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today

If no other volunteers, I can also work on 145, and 171. This should
take care all the issues in the short list(Since Kartha is already
working on 170, and Prasad on 162, 167.)

Best Regards,
Kevin
 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 08:31 AM
To: Satish Thatte; bpel spec
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today


I can take 155.

Best Regards,
Kevin


    
-----Original Message-----
From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 07:54 AM
To: bpel spec
Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today


Issue 145 Properties on Non-Message Variables 16 Dec 2004 
Issue 155 complexType Variables 9 Dec 2004 
Issue 162 Unique Activity Names for Compensate 15 Dec 2004 
Issue 167 Rethrow semantics clarification 27 Oct 2004 
Issue 170 How to handle faultcode, faultstring, and faultactor 3 Dec
2004 
Issue 171 faultName should be optional for invoke fault 
      
handlers 15 Dec
    
2004

This is the "to be incorporated" list Peter has (leaving out the
perennial stragglers), and I believe it correctly reflects 
      
the next set
    
of changes.  Let us discuss how to get them in today.

Satish

      
>
  



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]