[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] A Topic for the F2F?
Maciej, In this regard - in making the voodoo easier to do - we should also realize that BPSS is a great "business analyst friendly" toolset - and having the ability to define that top level in those pictures, and then drilldown to BPEL is a nice potential synergy. I also liked Fred's comments about OMG / UML / XMI - with the continuing work on aligning these pieces - we can focus on BPEL at the XML level first - get that done - and then review options at that point - on specifying bindings from various modelling approaches. DW. ========================================================= Message text written by "Maciej Szefler" > True, but this is what everyone wants (everyone buying BPM tools). As it is unlikely that business analysts would be capable of producing BPEL directly (even with a naive mapping to a visual representation), the BPEL tools should facilitate a collaboration between analysts and engineers as well as providing higher level abstractions suitable for manipulation by an analyst untrained in the voodoo of xpath manipulations, correlation sets, and compensation handlers. Maciej Szefler<
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]