OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsbpel] RE: Questions (RE: [wsbpel] Proposed agenda for May28-29 WS BPEL TC face to face)


Monica J. Martin wrote:

>> <<Arkin:The question arises, can you depend on the communication 
>> mechanism to always be session-based? The process definition would be 
>> more usable if it could remain protocol independent and so make the 
>> assumption that all communication mechanisms are always 
>> session-based. If we could handle sessions in the protocol binding 
>> that would allow us to define processes with the assumption of a 
>> session-based mechanism and support a variety of protocols and the 
>> different ways in which they handle sessions.
>>
>> I am looking into this right now, and my impression so far is that it 
>> can be done by standardizing on a set of properties that would be 
>> used for session handling, and then using either generic headers from 
>> session-based protocols, or addressing this in the protocol binding 
>> for specific protocols that do not support sessions natively. >>
>
>
>
> mm1: Look at the work of WSIA-WSRP and you may find some answers 
> there.  They determine early on, that your assumption is correct - not 
> all communication mechanisms support sessions (Please them though on 
> their findings).
>
> Monica
>
Good point! The issue we have is not unlike WSIA-WSRP, and the solution 
may be along the same lines.

arkin





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]