RE: [wsbpel] RE: Questions (RE: [wsbpel] Proposed agenda for May 28-29 WSBPEL TC face to face)

[Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>]

As long as those of you who are raising issues and ideas for resolutions are keeping track so they can be entered into the process when its ready, I think the informal discussion is good.  Once we have the process going, we will want to do a more formal review of each and whatever recommendations folks have.  

Regards, Diane
IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123

"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> 06/04/2003 06:54 PM

To:        "David RR Webber - XML ebusiness" <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>, "Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>         cc:        "Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com>, <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>, <edwink@collaxa.com>         Subject:        RE: [wsbpel] RE: Questions (RE: [wsbpel] Proposed agenda for  May 28-29 WS BPEL TC face to face)

Shouldn't we really defer these discussions and possible resolutions until
after
the issues reslution process has been put in place?

Martin,.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David RR Webber - XML ebusiness [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:42 AM
> To: Satish Thatte
> Cc: Assaf Arkin; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; edwink@collaxa.com
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel] RE: Questions (RE: [wsbpel] Proposed agenda for
> May 28-29 WS BPEL TC face to face)
>
>
> Satish,
>
> Surely this is only important if there are dependencies.  I'm assuming
> if they are - they are deferred dependencies, so they can be
> resolved by a later step, as either critical, or non-critical.
>
> We should be able to draw on parallel processing microprocessor
> theory here to provide mechanisms to control this?
>
> DW.
> ========================================================
> Message text written by "Satish Thatte"
> >So you are saying that there are four scopes that complete in
> non-deterministic order and two of them have commutative compensations and
> two don't?
>
> And what would be the proposed solution?  Annotating the commutative
> compensations to say <may be run in whatever order i.e.
> concurrently>?  How
> would you invoke them (assuming they have parameters)?  What if the
> commutative ones must be run concurrently but after the non-commutative
> ones?
> <
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org