wsbpel message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Implicit <sequence> macro
- From: "Yuzo Fujishima" <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com>
- To: <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:14:52 +0900
Hi,
I would like to propose what may be called "implicit sequence".
Implicit sequence "macro":
If multiple activities are placed in a process definition
where only one activity is allowed per se, assume there is an
implicit sequence activity that contains the activities.
Example:
Regard
<scope>
<receive/>
<invoke/>
<reply/>
</scope>
as
<scope>
<sequence> <!-- implicit sequence -->
<receive/>
<invoke/>
<reply/>
</sequence>
</scope>
Pros:
* More concise description.
Cons:
* ?
What do you think?
Yuzo Fujishima
NEC Corporation
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]