RE: [wsbpel] Implicit <sequence> macro

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Now if we had the issues process ready we could log this.
Jeff/Dieter/Yaron, where are we with that?

Satish

-----Original Message-----
From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:28 AM
To: edwink@collaxa.com; Satish Thatte; Yuzo Fujishima;
wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Implicit <sequence> macro

I agree. If we decide that sequence shortcuts are not good, then we
should be consistent throughout the spec and eliminate existing
shortcuts. Or we should provide a rationale for why existing shortcuts
like compensation are the only good ones.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edwin Khodabakchian [mailto:edwink@collaxa.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:30 PM
> To: 'Satish Thatte'; 'Yuzo Fujishima'; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Implicit <sequence> macro
> 
> 
> +1. Could we please apply the same logic to exception and compensation
> shortcuts? Shortcuts are evil! :-)
> 
> Edwin 
> 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:25 PM
> > To: Yuzo Fujishima; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> > 
> > Yuzo,
> > 
> > If we expected people to directly author processes at this 
> > level something like this would be attractive, but do you 
> > really expect that?
> > 
> > Satish
> > 
> >  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yuzo Fujishima [mailto:fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:15 PM
> > To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [wsbpel] Implicit <sequence> macro
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I would like to propose what may be called "implicit sequence".
> > 
> > Implicit sequence "macro":
> > If multiple activities are placed in a process definition 
> > where only one activity is allowed per se, assume there is an 
> > implicit sequence activity that contains the activities.
> > 
> > Example:
> > 
> > Regard
> >   <scope>
> >    <receive/>
> >    <invoke/>
> >    <reply/>
> >   </scope>
> > as
> >   <scope>
> >    <sequence>     <!-- implicit sequence -->
> >     <receive/>
> >     <invoke/>
> >     <reply/>
> >    </sequence>
> >   </scope>
> > 
> > Pros:
> > * More concise description.
> > 
> > Cons:
> > * ?
> > 
> > What do you think?
> > 
> > Yuzo Fujishima
> > NEC Corporation
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
>