Re: [wsbpel] Removing "compensating a process as a whole"

[David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Satish,

My experience with interoperability is that 'less is more' 
especially in V1.0!

Most critically - you need to have a Levels approach - so
each implementer has a clear way of indictating what they
have support for.  We've built the OASIS CAM spec' that way.

It really takes the 'sting' out of creating interoperable
implementations.

And as I noted in my previous email - you have to have the
touch points precisely defined.

In short - if interoperability is a goal - then we have to
have a strategy and approach for delivering on it.

DW.
=====================================================
Message text written by Assaf Arkin
> 
Is it fair to assume that the specification is intended to foster 
interoperability between systems? Can we do that and still leave a lot 
of things unspecified?

Satish <