RE: [wsbpel] Example for how compensation relates to WS-T (BA)

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

I agree with your logic so I edited the document to require that the title
be in the header and not in the body. Placing the same information in two
places is just begging for trouble.
	Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:25 PM
> To: Yaron Y. Goland
> Cc: Satish Thatte; edwink@collaxa.com; Yuzo Fujishima;
> wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Example for how compensation relates to WS-T (BA)
>
>
> Looks good.
>
> Since the issues list is mostly used for submitting new issues or
> changing their status, which I assume mean 2x e-mails per issue, I would
> recommend that the subject of a new issue e-mail should always contain
> the issue title. This will not burden the issues editor to much, but
> will force the submittor to propose a title that fits well in an e-mail
> subject line.
>
> arkin
>
> Yaron Y. Goland wrote:
>
> >There is a call on Monday between the issues process volunteers
> to discuss
> >the issues process. I updated the issues process document based on
> >discussions with several members of the group. It is now available in the
> >document repository at:
> >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/
> 2628/issues
> >process.htm.
> >
> >		Yaron
> >
> >
>
>
>