Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 32 - Link Semantics in Event Handlers

[Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>]

Can we scope this into two separate issues.

1. Serialization of the same event handler.

2. Serialization of separate event handlers in the same scope.

arkin

Dieter Roller wrote:

>I'm against any serialization. It introduces a restriction that is not
>needed and in fact can make things just more complicated. Suppose we have
>the following definition :
>
>
><eventHandlers>
>
> <onMessage>
>
></onMessage>
>
><onAlarm>
>
></onAlarm>
>
>a message has arrived and is processed by the activity in the onMessage
>event handler and the onAlarm is ready to go off. What would we do : wait
>with the alarm until the message has been processed ?
>
>I'm confident other people will find other examples where serialization
>hurts...
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>dieter
>  
>