OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
wsbpel
245 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
[wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management(BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 1 Sep 2003 01:01:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 30 Aug 2003 18:24:08 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 30 Aug 2003 01:25:51 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 30 Aug 2003 01:25:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 30 Aug 2003 01:15:32 -0000
Issue - 23 Proposed resolution for Sept 3rd TC call
From
"Kartha, Neelakantan" <N_Kartha@stercomm.com> on 29 Aug 2003 23:37:45 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 29 Aug 2003 22:42:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
"Greg Ritzinger" <GRitzinger@novell.com> on 29 Aug 2003 21:00:21 -0000
Proposed agenda for Sept. 3 WS BPEL TC call
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 29 Aug 2003 18:21:53 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Fri Aug 29 07:59:21 2003
Q: link crossing a fault-handler boundary
From
"Yuzo Fujishima" <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 29 Aug 2003 10:59:37 -0000
W3C Choreography working group publishes requirements document
From
Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net> on 29 Aug 2003 10:36:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 28 Aug 2003 14:42:16 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 28 Aug 2003 12:00:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 28 Aug 2003 06:17:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Sazi Temel" <sazi@bea.com> on 28 Aug 2003 04:25:52 -0000
[Fwd: re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 27 Aug 2003 22:53:43 -0000
re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 27 Aug 2003 22:27:32 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way tospecify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 27 Aug 2003 17:25:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 27 Aug 2003 17:07:08 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way tospecify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 27 Aug 2003 16:50:54 -0000
RE: Business Transaction Management and BPEL submission ( concerns issues 53 to 59)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 27 Aug 2003 14:32:55 -0000
Business Transaction Management and BPEL submission ( concerns issues 53 to 59)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 27 Aug 2003 10:03:40 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management(BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM
From
Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com> on 27 Aug 2003 06:38:29 -0000
[wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management(BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 27 Aug 2003 04:07:50 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard wayto specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 26 Aug 2003 23:30:29 -0000
RSVP for next month's F2F
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 26 Aug 2003 23:19:39 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] how far (distance/time) is the meeting site from SEATAC?
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 26 Aug 2003 23:03:01 -0000
Issue - 59 - BPEL process as business transaction participant
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 26 Aug 2003 22:39:54 -0000
Issue - 58 - Selective termination of business transaction participants
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 26 Aug 2003 22:39:53 -0000
Issue - 57 - Business transaction termination
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 26 Aug 2003 22:39:53 -0000
Issue - 56 - Business transaction creation
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 26 Aug 2003 22:39:53 -0000
Issue - 55 - Business transaction propagation
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 26 Aug 2003 22:39:52 -0000
Issue - 54 - Construct to hold Business transaction contexts
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 26 Aug 2003 22:39:52 -0000
Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 26 Aug 2003 22:39:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Aug 2003 21:18:56 -0000
how far (distance/time) is the meeting site from SEATAC?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 26 Aug 2003 20:36:06 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 25 - Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 26 Aug 2003 20:24:58 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 26 Aug 2003 17:58:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 26 Aug 2003 17:35:28 -0000
Original Design Goals for BPEL4WS
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 25 Aug 2003 21:45:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 23 - proposed resolution (add rationale) for TC
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 25 Aug 2003 16:13:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 25 Aug 2003 15:30:42 -0000
Input and Input/output
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 25 Aug 2003 15:18:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 23 - proposed resolution (add rationale) forTC
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 24 Aug 2003 20:40:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Aug 2003 00:02:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 21 Aug 2003 13:26:03 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Subject header numbering?
From
"Yuzo Fujishima" <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 21 Aug 2003 12:28:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Subject header numbering?
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 21 Aug 2003 09:16:58 -0000
Subject header numbering?
From
"Yuzo Fujishima" <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 21 Aug 2003 01:14:58 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way tospecify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 20 Aug 2003 20:36:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 20 Aug 2003 20:33:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Aug 2003 20:28:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 20 Aug 2003 20:12:59 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Aug 2003 19:51:59 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 20 Aug 2003 19:43:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 20 Aug 2003 18:48:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Aug 2003 18:25:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Aug 2003 18:18:38 -0000
Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 20 Aug 2003 17:35:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 23 - proposed resolution (add rationale) for TC
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 20 Aug 2003 16:36:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 20 Aug 2003 16:36:00 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 20 Aug 2003 16:24:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Tony Andrews" <tandrews@microsoft.com> on 20 Aug 2003 15:47:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way tospecify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 20 Aug 2003 15:37:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 25 - Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 20 Aug 2003 15:29:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 20 Aug 2003 15:12:58 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Summary So Far
From
"Tony Andrews" <tandrews@microsoft.com> on 20 Aug 2003 15:03:06 -0000
RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 20 Aug 2003 15:00:41 -0000
belated regret for 8/20/2003
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 20 Aug 2003 14:46:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 20 Aug 2003 14:34:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Hotels in Seattle
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 20 Aug 2003 14:08:36 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 25 - Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 20 Aug 2003 03:02:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] WS BPEL TC Call - Agenda for Aug. 20
From
"Sazi Temel" <sazi@bea.com> on 20 Aug 2003 00:14:52 -0000
RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 19 Aug 2003 22:01:26 -0000
RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 19 Aug 2003 21:19:31 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 23 - proposed resolution (add rationale) for TC
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 19 Aug 2003 19:35:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 19 Aug 2003 18:54:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Marin, Mike" <MMarin@filenet.com> on 19 Aug 2003 18:51:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 19 Aug 2003 18:34:59 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 23 - proposed resolution (add rationale) for TC
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 19 Aug 2003 18:28:00 -0000
[wsbpel] Issue - 11 XPath function summary
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 19 Aug 2003 13:10:03 -0000
Proposed liaison with CEFACT BPWG BCF effort
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 19 Aug 2003 03:16:16 -0000
Proposed liaison with CEFACT BPWG BCF effort
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 19 Aug 2003 02:40:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Link to Archive
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 19 Aug 2003 02:36:02 -0000
=?utf-8?Q?Issue_44_=E2=80=93_Summary_so_far=E2=80=A6?=
From
"Marin, Mike" <MMarin@filenet.com> on 19 Aug 2003 00:20:38 -0000
Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 18 Aug 2003 22:57:23 -0000
Issue - 11 Summary So Far
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 18 Aug 2003 22:56:34 -0000
Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify how flows in the same process send messages to each other?
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 18 Aug 2003 22:35:51 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 18 Aug 2003 22:06:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Link to Archive
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 18 Aug 2003 19:08:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Link to Archive
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 18 Aug 2003 18:34:16 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Link to Archive
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2003 18:33:54 -0000
Issue - 51 - Section 9.3.1 & Schema Validation
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 18 Aug 2003 18:27:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Link to Archive
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 18 Aug 2003 18:22:01 -0000
Link to Archive
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 18 Aug 2003 17:59:58 -0000
Issue - 23 - proposed resolution (add rationale) for TC
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 18 Aug 2003 17:12:25 -0000
Issue 39 - Proposed resolution
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 18 Aug 2003 15:51:54 -0000
[wsbpel] Regrets - Re: [wsbpel] WS BPEL TC Call - Agenda for Aug. 20
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 18 Aug 2003 12:13:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 17 Aug 2003 23:57:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 17 Aug 2003 23:57:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 17 Aug 2003 19:35:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activityand partnerLinkType
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 17 Aug 2003 19:12:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] FW: [chairs] RE: New OASIS TC FAQ Pages
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 17 Aug 2003 18:33:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 17 Aug 2003 18:26:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
Dieter Roller <rol@de.ibm.com> on 17 Aug 2003 05:08:06 -0000
Regrets Re: [wsbpel] WS BPEL TC Call - Agenda for Aug. 20
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 17 Aug 2003 01:07:58 -0000
Regrets - Re: [wsbpel] WS BPEL TC Call - Agenda for Aug. 20
From
Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com> on 16 Aug 2003 01:10:10 -0000
WS BPEL TC Call - Agenda for Aug. 20
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 15 Aug 2003 21:59:58 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 14 Aug 2003 19:27:16 -0000
Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
Dieter Roller <rol@de.ibm.com> on 14 Aug 2003 07:31:02 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 14 Aug 2003 05:11:48 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 23:45:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 13 Aug 2003 23:11:36 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 48 - XML Transform Support
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 13 Aug 2003 23:11:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 13 Aug 2003 22:48:28 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 21:30:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 21:26:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] FW: [chairs] RE: New OASIS TC FAQ Pages
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 13 Aug 2003 21:23:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 13 Aug 2003 21:21:05 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 13 Aug 2003 21:10:01 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 13 Aug 2003 20:57:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 20:14:20 -0000
FW: [chairs] RE: New OASIS TC FAQ Pages
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 13 Aug 2003 20:11:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 13 Aug 2003 19:06:33 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 18:55:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 18:51:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 13 Aug 2003 18:18:49 -0000
Hotels in Seattle
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 18:11:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 17:51:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 13 Aug 2003 17:16:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Aug 2003 16:48:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 13 Aug 2003 13:14:05 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 12 Aug 2003 20:32:42 -0000
Issue - 50 - Semantics for "dangling receive"
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 12 Aug 2003 18:28:06 -0000
Issue - 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 12 Aug 2003 18:28:06 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 12 Aug 2003 17:46:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activityand partnerLinkType
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 12 Aug 2003 17:34:01 -0000
RE: Issue - 33 - invoke/receive-callback race conditions, even in the 1.1 sample (p.22)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 12 Aug 2003 16:16:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 12 Aug 2003 13:35:39 -0000
Issue - 48 - XML Transform Support
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 12 Aug 2003 10:56:05 -0000
Issue - 33 - invoke/receive-callback race conditions, even in the 1.1 sample (p.22)
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 12 Aug 2003 10:29:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 12 Aug 2003 05:50:12 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 12 Aug 2003 01:39:02 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 12 Aug 2003 00:01:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 22:24:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 25 - Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 22:22:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 11 Aug 2003 21:14:31 -0000
Test - please ignore
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 20:54:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Marin, Mike" <MMarin@filenet.com> on 11 Aug 2003 20:04:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 25 - Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 11 Aug 2003 20:01:11 -0000
re: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 19:53:40 -0000
re: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 19:52:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 25 - Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 19:50:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 25 - Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 11 Aug 2003 19:45:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 19:42:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 19:38:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 25 - Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 19:31:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] invoke/receive-callback race conditions, even in the 1.1 sample (p.22)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Aug 2003 06:16:43 -0000
re: [wsbpel] Original Authors' Design Goals for BPEL4WS
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 10 Aug 2003 02:17:12 -0000
Original Authors' Design Goals for BPEL4WS
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 9 Aug 2003 21:25:13 -0000
Issue - 45 - Wording of "while" activity
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 9 Aug 2003 00:37:28 -0000
re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Editing 9.3.1
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 9 Aug 2003 00:32:28 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Editing 9.3.1
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 8 Aug 2003 22:20:02 -0000
Issue - 11 - Editing 9.3.1
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 8 Aug 2003 22:14:38 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 8 Aug 2003 20:48:32 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 8 Aug 2003 20:06:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 8 Aug 2003 19:44:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 8 Aug 2003 19:44:31 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 8 Aug 2003 19:37:25 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 8 Aug 2003 19:07:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 8 Aug 2003 14:15:33 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] License Contact For BEA, SAP and Siebel?
From
"Yuzo Fujishima" <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 8 Aug 2003 08:21:35 -0000
Issue - 47 - Which Version of WSDL should we use?
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 8 Aug 2003 08:20:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 8 Aug 2003 08:02:33 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 8 Aug 2003 03:33:05 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2003 03:08:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 8 Aug 2003 02:50:12 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 8 Aug 2003 02:15:47 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2003 00:45:03 -0000
WSBPEL FAQ Page - your input needed
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 7 Aug 2003 22:10:58 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 7 Aug 2003 21:40:17 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 7 Aug 2003 21:38:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 7 Aug 2003 21:17:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 7 Aug 2003 21:10:21 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 45 - Wording of "while" activity
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 7 Aug 2003 21:07:03 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 45 - Wording of "while" activity
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 7 Aug 2003 21:04:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 7 Aug 2003 21:02:30 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 7 Aug 2003 21:00:46 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 7 Aug 2003 20:52:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 7 Aug 2003 20:51:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 7 Aug 2003 20:45:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> on 7 Aug 2003 20:44:14 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 7 Aug 2003 20:37:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 7 Aug 2003 20:35:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 7 Aug 2003 20:19:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> on 7 Aug 2003 19:06:17 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> on 7 Aug 2003 18:51:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 7 Aug 2003 17:44:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 7 Aug 2003 17:41:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 7 Aug 2003 17:26:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 7 Aug 2003 17:10:59 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 7 Aug 2003 17:04:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 7 Aug 2003 16:37:36 -0000
Groups - WSBPEL TC meeting 08062003 consolidated minutes.pdf uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 7 Aug 2003 16:01:03 -0000
Issue - 46 - Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 7 Aug 2003 15:39:24 -0000
Issue - 45 - Wording of "while" activity
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 7 Aug 2003 10:22:57 -0000
Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 7 Aug 2003 10:22:27 -0000
Issue - 3 - current state in compensation handlers (resent message)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 7 Aug 2003 10:10:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 7 Aug 2003 02:30:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 7 Aug 2003 01:37:41 -0000
Namespace for the document fragment representing a part
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 7 Aug 2003 01:31:32 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 6 Aug 2003 22:54:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 6 Aug 2003 22:12:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 6 Aug 2003 22:07:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 6 Aug 2003 21:53:46 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 6 Aug 2003 21:45:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 6 Aug 2003 21:38:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 6 Aug 2003 21:15:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 6 Aug 2003 21:07:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 6 Aug 2003 21:07:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 6 Aug 2003 20:51:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 6 Aug 2003 20:11:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 6 Aug 2003 19:56:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 6 Aug 2003 19:44:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Glenn Mi" <gmi@collaxa.com> on 6 Aug 2003 18:27:03 -0000
Issue - 11 - Partial Schema Compliance
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 6 Aug 2003 18:01:14 -0000
Issue - 11 - Ambiguous insertion points
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 6 Aug 2003 17:37:16 -0000
Issue - 11 Query in <to> close should allow assigning to new locations
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 6 Aug 2003 16:49:08 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 5 Aug 2003 21:48:58 -0000
Update to agenda for Aug. 6 WS BPEL TC Call
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 5 Aug 2003 18:41:12 -0000
Issue - 44 - portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 5 Aug 2003 09:38:03 -0000
Re: FW: [wsbpel] Proposed resolution of Issue 39 - Inconsistent syntax for query attribute values in spec examples
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 5 Aug 2003 05:09:17 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Agenda for Aug. 6 WS BPEL TC Call
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 4 Aug 2003 20:38:01 -0000
Re: FW: [wsbpel] Proposed resolution of Issue 39 - Inconsistent syntax for query attribute values in spec examples
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 4 Aug 2003 20:25:40 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Agenda for Aug. 6 WS BPEL TC Call
From
"Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com> on 4 Aug 2003 20:24:25 -0000
RE: Issue 39 - Proposed resolution of Issue 39 - Inconsistent syntax for query attribute values in spec examples
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 4 Aug 2003 19:02:34 -0000
RE: FW: [wsbpel] Proposed resolution of Issue 39 - Inconsistent syntax for query attribute values in spec examples
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 4 Aug 2003 18:52:39 -0000
Groups - BPEL TC Minutes July23 2of2.doc uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 1 Aug 2003 20:46:49 -0000
Groups - TC Minutes July 23 1 of 2.doc uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 1 Aug 2003 20:46:00 -0000
Out of Office AutoReply: Groups - oasis - Ballot "WS BPEL TC issue process" has closed
From
"Fesq, BJ" <bj_fesq@standardandpoors.com> on 1 Aug 2003 19:57:02 -0000
Out of Office AutoReply: Groups - oasis - Ballot "WS BPEL TC issue process" has closed
From
"Lipton, Paul C" <Paul.Lipton@ca.com> on 1 Aug 2003 19:52:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 39 - Proposed resolution of Issue 39 (2nd version) -Inconsistent syntax for query attribute values in spec examples
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 1 Aug 2003 18:01:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Proposed resolution of Issue 39 (2nd version) - Inconsistent syntax for query attribute values in spec examples
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Aug 2003 17:46:36 -0000
Issue - 36 - Addentum: BPEL Code Fragment
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 1 Aug 2003 08:11:22 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2