wsbpel message

Subject: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify how flows in the same process send messages to each other?

From: ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com>
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 23:55:23 +0100

This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list. The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent document with the title in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.

Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify how flows in the same process send messages to each other?

Status: open
Date added: 18 Aug 2003
Submitter: Yaron Goland
Date submitted: 18 August 2003
Document: BPEL Spec
Description: Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify how flows in the same process send messages to each other? It is possible and critical that flows in the same process be able to send messages to each other but there is no standard way to specify that this is happening in a BPEL process definition.
Changes: 18 Aug 2003 - new issue

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 52 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message.

To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document.