RE: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries]

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Issue 52 is definitely not about correlation :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Monica Martin [mailto:monica.martin@sun.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:42 AM
To: ws bpel tc
Subject: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003:
Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries]

Per Diane's request to post suggestions.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues 
Categories for Discussion Boundaries
Date: 	Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:54:30 -0600
From: 	Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>
To: 	bpel rqmts <wsbpel-reqts@lists.oasis-open.org>, Diane Jordan 
<drj@us.ibm.com>



Diane,
In Wednesday's call we discussed trying to put the issues in similar 
functional buckets for discussion, not particularly categorization by 
priority. I think several of the priorities by function are apparent, 
but (as we discussed) this is for the TC to decide.

Here is a broad categorization to discuss issues.  They fall pretty 
nicely except we may need to decompose correlation further, and also 
discuss it understanding clear definitions for conversation, transaction

and business transaction.  I anticipate these will be discussed and the 
recognition made during the face-to-face in September.

I would like to propose these be considered by the TC to bound [re:
provide a focus for]
discussions. Whether or not the proposals or the volunteers champions 
are combined, that's will be up to this SC and the TC itself.

I am formally asking we bring this up on Wednesday and consider 
discussing the issues in this fashion in the F2F.

Thank you.