[wsbpel] 9/3/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion - Update fromSuggestion

[Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>]

Updated with Issue 52:
In general: state management-activities
More specifics: data sharing / concurrency

Perhaps we could look at this to think about parallel tracks at the F2F.

Thanks.

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     RE: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 
> 8/29/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries]
> Date:     Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:14:48 -0700
> From:     Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>
> To:     Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>, ws bpel tc 
> <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
>
>
>
> Issue 52 is definitely not about correlation :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monica Martin [mailto:monica.martin@sun.com] Sent: Wednesday, 
> September 03, 2003 8:42 AM
> To: ws bpel tc
> Subject: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003:
> Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries]
>
> Per Diane's request to post suggestions.
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues 
> Categories for Discussion Boundaries
> Date:     Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:54:30 -0600
> From:     Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>
> To:     bpel rqmts <wsbpel-reqts@lists.oasis-open.org>, Diane Jordan 
> <drj@us.ibm.com>
>
>
>
> Diane,
> In Wednesday's call we discussed trying to put the issues in similar 
> functional buckets for discussion, not particularly categorization by 
> priority. I think several of the priorities by function are apparent, 
> but (as we discussed) this is for the TC to decide.
>
> Here is a broad categorization to discuss issues.  They fall pretty 
> nicely except we may need to decompose correlation further, and also 
> discuss it understanding clear definitions for conversation, transaction
>
> and business transaction.  I anticipate these will be discussed and 
> the recognition made during the face-to-face in September.
>
> I would like to propose these be considered by the TC to bound [re:
> provide a focus for]
> discussions. Whether or not the proposals or the volunteers champions 
> are combined, that's will be up to this SC and the TC itself.
>
> I am formally asking we bring this up on Wednesday and consider 
> discussing the issues in this fashion in the F2F.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
> of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>
>
>
>
>

CategoriesMatrix_ToIssuesTeam_090303.xls