RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Danny,

What was the motivation for the "rename" variant?  All the others seem
to be structural, and oriented towards handling optional and repeating
elements, which I thought was the original issue.

Satish

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:15 AM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down

In today's conference call, we limited the scope of issue 11 to exclude
adding any new external dependencies.  Previously, of the 2 outstanding
proposals, I think the consensus was leaning more towards my proposal.
I
propose that anyone who cares to refine my original proposal, or take
the
discussion elsewhere please do so.  The goal is to have a strawman
votable
proposal on the table at the F2F and then go from there.  Here, for your
convenience, is a link to my original proposal.

danny

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200308/msg00157.html



To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr
oup.php.