[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
++1 -----Original Message----- From: Edwin Khodabakchian [mailto:edwink@collaxa.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:07 AM To: 'Danny van der Rijn'; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Q: process priority? I agree with Danny on this one. The process category is information that would be best maintained in a BPEL process deployment descriptor. It seem that standardizing the deployment descriptor is not in the scope of this initial effort. - Edwin > -----Original Message----- > From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:00 AM > To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority? > > while i don't fully understand what you're getting at with > process category, process priority isn't, to me, a property > of the process, but a property of the environment in which it > executes. to draw an analogy, operating system processes > don't know their own priority. it's the OS that keeps track > of that. i'm thinking that process category might be a > similar construct? > > danny > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sid Askary" <saskary@nuperus.com> > To: <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:55 AM > Subject: [wsbpel] Q: process priority? > > > > Since we are dealing with an execution language, the > question of runtime > > priority comes to mind. One could imagine an additional > process property. > > While there may be other methods, this could explicitly be > expressed as an > > additional binary attribute to the process element followed, > conditionally, > > by a new element. > > > > a) > > <process name="ncname" targetNamespace="uri" > > queryLanguage="anyURI"? > > . > > . > > prioritize="yes|no"?/> > > > > b) > > <priority name="ncname" > > priorityNumber="anynumber" > > PriorityNumberBase="anynumber"/> > > > > NOTE: PriorityNumberBase reflects the devisor for PriorityNumber. > > Alternatively, one could replace the two by a single floating-point > > fraction. > > > > > > What does the group think? > > > > Thanks, > > Sid. > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of > the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le ave_workgroup.php. > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le ave_workgroup.php. > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr oup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]