wsbpel message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Glossary for WSBPEL??
- From: "Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com>
- To: <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:36:42 +0100
Title: Message
Dear
Colleagues,
On the use case
sub-group teleconference yesterday we stumbled across the issue of the need to
define certain terms for our use.
Our desire in the
use case group would be to use terms generally recognised in business in the Use
Case document - rather than BPEL specific terms. Unfortunately our
suspicion is that this may depend on which person you ask and which industry
they are in.
We therefore felt it
necessary to specify certain terms so that we can use that language in the Use
Case document, and attempt to use it consistently. We noted that terms are
used in the current 1.1 specification and specified in line explicitly or
implicitly, but there is no Glossary / Definition of Key Terms chapter or
Appendix. We feel that such should exist and be maintained at the group
level so that we all try to use terms consistently in our work, whether as part
of the main group or any of the sub-groups.
I was actioned to
make you all aware of this. The Use Case sub-group is willing to initiate
work on a Glossary / Definition of Key Terms and leave it to the chairs /
the main group to decide how and when to transition the work into the main
group.
Please send
suggestions for business terms, and their definitions, that we do already use or
you think we may need to use in any of our documents to myself ( tony.fletcher@choreology.com ) and Monica Martin (Monica.Martin@Sun.COM)
Please reply
directly to this message if for some reason you think that this is not a good
idea.
Some terms can be
defined so that they overlap with others and part of the work overall will be to
agree the set of terms that we will use while recognising others as synonyms or
very similar terms (for instance 'party' and 'partner' ?).
The sort of terms
that we were thinking of include (note these are examples generated by Tony for
the purpose of this message - they are not the considered opinion of the use
case group):
Party,
Partner, Role, Transaction, Business Process, executable process,
abstract process, enterprise, business protocol, cancel (cancellation), confirm
(confirmation), compensate (compensation). activity, and many
others.
We only need to
define terms that we use in one, or more, of our documents, and where the common
usage of the term is not sufficiently well known, or inadequate or not quite
what we mean.
Other groups have
also embarked on a similar exercise (e.g. UN/CEFACT and W3C
WS-Choreography). Could we / should we make use of their terms and
definitions (for saves effort and re-invention, against copyright
problems).
Does anyone know of
a publicly and readily available 'dictionary' of business terminology or
any thing like that, that we could reference and make use of (and thus only need
to have our own definition when the given one does not fit for our
purpose.
I think it would be
wise for the use case group to now await initial responses before going any
further - maybe take up this work in earnest after the face to face meeting - if
it is still deemed appropriate.
Best
Regards,
Tony
|
Tony
Fletcher
Technical
Advisor
Choreology
Ltd. 68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J
UK |
Phone:
|
+44
(0) 870 7390076 |
Mobile:
|
+44
(0) 7801 948219 |
Fax:
|
+44
(0) 870 7390077 |
Web: |
www.choreology.com |
Cohesions™ |
Business
transaction management software for application
coordination |
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
|
Home:
amfletcher@iee.org |
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]