[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
Diane, Thanks for the clarification. Unfortunately on the conference call we all referred to the "BPWG", which led to the confusion. I do believe we need to re-visit this - and so, as you suggest - we do need to evaluate this to clarify what the useful purpose is. I'm not trying to shoot the messenger (Tony!) here. I can see now the chain of events. I'd much prefer to focus Tony's excellent skills on what we really need, now the landscape has become clear. Thanks, DW. - Quoting Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>: > In the discussions around establishing a liaison, and in the exact wording > of the motion, there was no commitment that the Oasis BPEL TC would do > anything with or for the CEFACT group. The liaison is a communication > channel. Any plans to do anything more than keep our group up to date on > happenings in the BPWG would need to be reviewed and voted on by the TC. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]