[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 20 - installing compensation handlers for faultedscopes
> Your pattern (c) is actually likely to be not uncommon since processes > often perform risky optional work. This then becomes the "don't care" > case. The scope's success\failure will likely be reflected in shared > data and integrated into the logic that way. > > Regarding alternative completion one can already do that with > conditional work following an unsuccessful scope completion. Not fully > integrated at the scope level but it seems less complex to understand > than explicit control over installation of compensation handling in > fault cases. Sure, i would like to propose to close this issue. Diane, John, do we have to vote to close? Thank you.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]