[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts
Ugo, I take it you place a heavy value of the existing wording of the specification. I find this curious; other than saving the TC some time, what other benefits are there to preserving the submitted spec substantially "as is"? More broadly, what the role of this TC? Chiefly editorial? -Ron Ugo Corda wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]