Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions

["Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>]

I'm confused .. can you give an example of what you mean by
"abstract messages that are not part of an abstract operation"?
Maybe I haven't understood what you have in mind ..

Thanks,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "Francisco Curbera"
<curbera@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ron Ten-Hove" <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>; "Satish Thatte"
<satisht@microsoft.com>; <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>; <ygoland@bea.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:04 AM
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions


> So are you saying that WSIF can only process a subset of all the legal
(according to WSDL 1.1) WSDL files? (Please notice that I am not talking
about adding any extension at the abstract level - just supporting what is
allowed by WSDL 1.1)
>
> Ugo
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:00 PM
> > To: Ugo Corda; Francisco Curbera
> > Cc: Ron Ten-Hove; Satish Thatte; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org;
> > ygoland@bea.com
> > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation
> > definitions
> >
> >
> > "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> writes:
> > >
> > > Just curious: does WSIF allow you to define abstract
> > messages that are not
> > part of an abstract operation?
> > >
> > > Ugo
> >
> > No it doesn't; WSIF only adds additional bindings to WSDL,
> > not anything
> > at the abstract level.
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> >