[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
Please look at the example I gave at http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue77. In that example, the abstract message "Header" is not part of the abstract operation "op1" (but is still mapped to the concrete binding of "op1"). Ugo > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:46 PM > To: Ugo Corda; Francisco Curbera > Cc: Ron Ten-Hove; Satish Thatte; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; > ygoland@bea.com > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation > definitions > > > I'm confused .. can you give an example of what you mean by > "abstract messages that are not part of an abstract operation"? > Maybe I haven't understood what you have in mind .. > > Thanks, > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> > To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; > "Francisco Curbera" > <curbera@us.ibm.com> > Cc: "Ron Ten-Hove" <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>; "Satish Thatte" > <satisht@microsoft.com>; <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>; > <ygoland@bea.com> > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:04 AM > Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation > definitions > > > > So are you saying that WSIF can only process a subset of > all the legal > (according to WSDL 1.1) WSDL files? (Please notice that I am > not talking > about adding any extension at the abstract level - just > supporting what is > allowed by WSDL 1.1) > > > > Ugo > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:00 PM > > > To: Ugo Corda; Francisco Curbera > > > Cc: Ron Ten-Hove; Satish Thatte; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; > > > ygoland@bea.com > > > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation > > > definitions > > > > > > > > > "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> writes: > > > > > > > > Just curious: does WSIF allow you to define abstract > > > messages that are not > > > part of an abstract operation? > > > > > > > > Ugo > > > > > > No it doesn't; WSIF only adds additional bindings to WSDL, > > > not anything > > > at the abstract level. > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]